Cecil Lammey is the NFL Insider for ESPN Denver and a senior writer for Footballguys.com He has almost every game on tape from 1992 until now, and every preseason game on tape from the year 2000. When he's not watching tape (or out at Broncos HQ Dove Valley) Cecil enjoys spending time with his kids out at the family ranch, drawing (former comic book artist), and riding his chopper.

He has several contacts throughout the league and has traveled to every major All Star Game (Shrine Game, Senior Bowl, Texas Vs Nation), Scouting Combine, and NFL Draft each of the last eight years. Cecil broke into radio in 2003 on Mark Schlereth's local radio show in Denver. Now, 10+ years later, he's one of the most well respected analysts that covers the game of football from every angle.

Bulletin Board

or to post this comment
  • Jim R posted 830 days ago

    Jim R

    Cecil - Where has your content gone? I miss your insight and analysis on the Broncos. Are you still writing for Bleacher Report? Please return soon, I seek out your articles as worth reading, unlike much of the other fluff Broncos content on BR

  • Tom Locke posted 979 days ago

    Tom  Locke

    Dear Cecil Lammey: I’m sending this in hopes that you will be interested in statements that have been far from the truth from the city and county of Denver regarding the attendance estimates at the Broncos celebration on Feb. 9. Here’s something I put together regarding a package of stories now on a website mainly for students at MSU-Denver. Thanks for your consideration. Tom Locke

    Experts say Broncos parade estimate three to five times too high

    The 1 million-person estimate for attendance at the Super Bowl 50 victory parade for the Denver Broncos was three to five times higher than the actual number of attendees, according to experts in the United Kingdom, Austria, Hong Kong and Arizona.

    The experts are Austrian Alexandar Kollaritsch, who owns Vienna-based 4mation Event and Security Consulting gmbh; G. Keith Still, professor of crowd science at Manchester Metropolitan University (UK), Paul Yip, professor in social sciences at the University of Hong Kong, and Stephen Doig, Knight Chair professor of journalism at Arizona State University in Tempe.

    They examined photographs and maps of the parade route and Denver Civic Center, where entertainment and a rally were held, in order to come to their conclusions. Kollaritsch produced the most detailed analysis, and he estimated an attendance of 198,000. He is a student of Still in an online course in crowd safety and risk analysis.

    For further information, see the story, Kollaritsch analysis, and three accompanying stories on the matter at www.post-telegraph.com. They were posted to the website on March 10 and can be found at:

    Main story with one accompanying story and a link to the Kollaritsch analysis: http://www.post-telegraph.com/news/experts-broncos-parade-estimate-3-5-times-too-high/
    Transportation: http://www.post-telegraph.com/news/through-the-transportation-lens/
    Methodology: http://www.post-telegraph.com/news/a-look-at-methodology/

    The website is mostly for students of Metropolitan State University of Denver. The main story and accompanying stories were written by MSU-Denver affiliate journalism professor Tom Locke.

    For questions, contact information is as follows:

    Tom Locke Alexandar Kollaritsch G. Keith Still
    720-261-7484 +43 676 416 58 77 +44 (0) 1524 782363
    tlocke3@msudenver.edu ak@4mation.at GKStill@me.com
    Colorado, U.S. www.4mation.at www.GKStill.com
    Vienna, Austria Manchester, England

  • Frank Alvarado posted 1359 days ago

    Frank Alvarado

    This is my first time i visit here London escorts. I found so many entertaining stuff in your blog, especially its discussion. From the tons of comments on your articles, I guess I am not the only one having all the enjoyment here! Keep up the good work.

  • Dan Boyn posted 1393 days ago

    Dan Boyn


    DeflateGate has erupted onto the National stage, and seems poised to stay there through Superbowl Sunday and beyond. It has been a fascinating, tortured soap opera that has vexed most of us and brought out the worst in some of us. What if this controversy can be resolved through a more reasoned process? What if it could provide a teachable moment for the country about how justice and fairness can be undermined by our collective ignorance of established science and fact, and how what we don't know can distort our beliefs and actions? It is with such high hopes that I share these thoughts with you about under-inflated footballs.


    To determine if the New England Patriots have violated NFL rules about ball inflation, the main question is, "Was the drop in ball pressure due to natural causes or tampering?" As Coach Belichick explained last Saturday, the best way to truly answer this question is to do an experiment. Before such an experiment, a scientist will need to form a testable hypothesis, a prediction, based on the facts of the situation and what is known about natural laws. In this case, the relevant physical law is the Ideal Gas Law (Pressure x Volume = n x R x Temperature) combined with the fact that friction generates heat.

    Check out this informative video which also explains the science behind the pressure-drop: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hf8oQ4rhR-A


    Knowing the conditions at the AFC Championship game and how the Patriot’s footballs were treated, it’s not hard to anticipate the result based on the four different physical phases the balls went through. The logical prediction is that ball pressure would drop significantly below the NFL minimum 12.5 psi. In fact, this is a certainty:

    1) Rubbing Phase - Before the AFC Championship game, Brady's balls were in the locker room, where the air temperature was likely 70-75 degrees. His balls were then rubbed vigorously for a substantial preparation period. The rubbing created heat from friction. The heat increased the air Temperature in the footballs above the indoor temperature. The warm air couldn't expand the footballs by much, so the Pressure would increase.

    2) Cooling Phase A - Brady's warmed balls were given to referee Walt Anderson, who was asked to set the pressure at 12.5 psi. The warmed balls stayed in the official's locker room for over 2 hours and gradually cooled back to the indoor temperature. This initial drop in Temperature would result in a corresponding drop in Pressure (approx 1 psi per Coach Belichick).

    3) Cooling Phase B - 10 minutes before kickoff, the balls were taken by NFL staff to the sideline. The temperature was approximately 50 degrees, but would have been lower on surfaces exposed to rain and wind-chill. Over the course of the first half, Brady's wet balls would have cooled to below 50 degrees. This second drop in ball Temperature would result in a further drop in ball Pressure (psi).

    4) Stretching Phase - In addition, the leather of a wet football stretches, increasing the Volume inside it. Increased ball Volume would cause a third drop in ball Pressure (psi). Did you see the condition of the balls? Several pictures show them dripping wet and soaked through in the hands of the players and referees. The leather would have stretched - how much would have to be determined by experiment.

    Taken together, these physical and climate factors would definitely drop the pressure in the footballs to substantially below the 12.5 psi set, per NFL protocol, by officials 2 hours pregame. This is not a possibility, it is a certainty.

    Just like when you hold a solid object in your hand then let it go, it will fall according to physical laws (gravity), so it is that whenever a referee in their locker room inflates a warmed ball to the lower limit of 12.5 psi, then takes it out into cold, wet, windy weather, that ball will be underinflated 100% of the time. There is no question that this has happened countless times in late season, cold weather games throughout the history of the National Football League. Asterisks all around for everybody, especially the Packers!


    Aside from the certainty of cold weather pressure drop, the real question we are left with is, "How much does it drop?" This will be answered not by rifling through the team's email, text messages and surveillance video, but rather by an experiment. Hence Coach Belichick's usual common sense in taking the opportunity to do just this before the team left Foxborough. Until someone else performs and documents the definitive experiment (several amateur scientists have posted attempts on YouTube), we should all take him at his word that ball pressure would have dropped enough, without any tampering, to account for what was observed by the referees during the recent AFC championship game.


    It should be pointed out that an NFL football team could have avoided football deflation below the league minimum 12.5 psi in very cold weather by checking the ball pressure on the sideline during the game and pumping more air into them (increasing the “n” in the Ideal Gas Law). However, this would violate NFL rules by tampering with the balls. Teams have been placed by the NFL in an untenable situation where they’re “damned if you do and damned if you don’t”… and double-dog-damned if they happen to be the New England Patriots.


    During this fascinating, frustrating, all-consuming week of DeflateGate, some might wonder how could so many intelligent, highly paid NFL executives and officials have established such a flawed rule, a rule that appear ignorant of the fact that cold weather drops ball Pressure.

    The DeflateGate "scandal" rages on because so many remain mystified by the inexplicable deflation of footballs in a cold, wet game. The science needed to dispel this mystery is not hard to grasp. In fact, the ideal gas law was formulated back in 1834, and is taught in high school physics class. Tragically, many journalists and commentators lack this knowledge and have plunged ahead recklessly with false accusations and little curiosity about the basic facts of the matter. They think that for the pressure to drop significantly, someone must have let air out of the Patriots balls. They just know it. Emboldened by ignorance and sinister suspicion, they have proclaimed the Patriots must have cheated by intentionally let air out of the balls by tampering with them. We wonder why so many media pundits have been so blind to their ignorance.

    Answers to these questions come from the other important scientific field at play in DeflateGate: Cognitive and Social Psychology. Discussion of this is complex and goes way beyond the issue of football pressure, but is extremely relevant to the media and society at large. If you are interested, please look up "Cognitive Bias" and "The Dunning-Kruger effect: Why The Incompetent Don’t Know They’re Incompetent".

    The science of cognitive bias is necessary to help us to understand how overconfident NFL officials established unworkable inflation rules. It also helps us to better understand why so many pundits have failed to appreciate the reasons for football deflation in a cold wet game yet have gone on to lob accusations of ball tampering with great confidence and righteous indignation (and a few tears).


    While the science of human cognition and its limitations is probably powerless to eliminate the mass hysteria of DeflateGate, Obama birthers or Climate change luddites, high school physics can reliably keep NFL footballs properly inflated during games in any kind of weather. It could, in some small way, embody the way an enlightened society can solve problems in a rational, effective manner. Like most true solutions, the fix for NFL balls is simple, cost effective and elegant. Here it is:

    1) Keep the current process of the teams giving their game balls to the officials 2-3 hours before kick-off. The officials have time to inspect the balls and allow time to correct any concerns.
    2) At least 90 minutes before kick-off, the officials place the balls in breathable tamper proof bags or other containers, seal the containers with tamper-proof fasteners, and take them down to the field. This will allow the air inside the footballs to equilibrate to the climactic conditions (i.e. temperature) on the field.
    3) The bags should be placed in plain sight of both teams, fans and officials in the center of the field. In any case, they must not be left near sideline heaters or fans.
    4) The outside of the containers should be reflective White in color. (If the containers were black or other dark color and left in the sun, they will heat up the balls and prevent equilibration.
    5) Whether to keep the balls dry from any rain will have to be determined.
    6) The officials will break open the tamper-proof seals 10-20 minutes before kickoff, remove the balls, and adjust air pressure to NFL specifications.
    7) Officials should be allowed to check and readjust ball pressures at half-time or other times during the game.

    Problem solved.


    DeflateGate is the unfortunate outcome of irrational rules for pregame football inflation that have been adopted by NFL executives, lawyers and business owners who clearly lacked common sense and a knowledge of basic high-school physics. Robert Kraft’s indignation is certainly justified, but should be tempered by the realization that he joined so many others in implementing these rules. While apparently competent to manage business and legal matters, one wonders about the competency of NFL officials to handle all the other important matters facing the unprecedented sport of American football (like the epidemic of concussions and head injuries, for which there is also a simple scientific solution).

    DeflateGate is not about who said what to who, about whether a coach or player is popular or likeable, about whether anyone should have felt a drop in football pressure by squeezing the ball, about how long it takes a ball-boy to relieve himself before heading to the sideline, or about whether deflation makes it easier or harder to hold, throw or catch a football. At least, this is not what it should be about. No, this controversy is simply about the pressure-drop in footballs during a cold, wet game. To determine whether or not pressure would have naturally dropped without tampering, the NFL needs a few scientists, not a team of lawyers on a witch hunt in need of a conspiracy. Most importantly, there is a simple, science-based process that NFL referees can easily follow to prevent similar problems in the future. It involves leaving the balls in sealed white bags at midfield for 90 minutes then adjusting ball pressure 15 minutes before kick-off.

    Please consider these comments and feel free to publish, print, reproduce and pass on any portion of them.







  • David Guidera posted 1431 days ago

    David Guidera

    Thanks for the perspective in your article about Peyton Manning's recent struggles, Cecil. It was influential in my most recent article.

  • Snow Goose posted 1433 days ago

    Snow Goose

    Cecil- You should correct the 1st paragraph of your article about Broncos Game Plan vs Bengals. 4 wins in a row and 22-10 over SD. Just a heads up.

  • Snow Goose posted 1840 days ago

    Snow Goose


    I just want to say I sure like reading your coverage of the Broncos! Your articles are researched and come from obvious time (lots of it) spent actually watching and thinking about Denver. I don;t always agree, but I do always enjoy your perspective.

    Thanks for covering Denver much better than anyone!